AG-UI.AI / EDITORIAL METHOD

Trust comes from traceable work.

Independent, verifiable and correctable. No unsupported claims to be the largest or best.

Our editorial method ↗

Scope

We cover Generative UI across models, products, protocols, frameworks, research and practice. Source discovery is continuous; one company’s view is not the whole field.

Verification before interpretation

We record event date, source publication date, collection time and verification date separately. Historical additions are labeled by their original dates. We prioritize announcements, specifications, releases and original papers.

Evidence-based automatic publication

Automation can publish bilingual summaries and analysis after reading the original source, confirming dates and resolving material conflicts. Missing facts, inaccessible sources and conflicts enter a review queue. Independently verifiable portions may be reported with explicit limits.

Different evidence, different weight

Official announcements, vendor benchmarks, papers and community observations carry separate labels. Leadership claims are attributed and bounded by the evaluation scope. We never present an unreplicated result as our own measurement.

Perspectives with evidence

Every perspective links supporting events and explains limitations, counterevidence and conditions to test. News volume is not adoption. We write original summaries and interpretation, never mirrors of full articles.

Corrections and withdrawals

Changes preserve their reasons and dates. Withdrawn records retain an explanation but leave the news listing and RSS. Report corrections with a source and specific issue through our community links.

Update status

The planned cadence is 08:00 and 20:00 Singapore time daily, with a Monday 09:00 digest. Cloud read/write acceptance must pass before schedules are enabled. We show actual successful runs and flag data older than 36 hours. Email is awaiting activation.