ResearchResearch paper

TAM turns verified task advancement into online state and reusable operations for GUI agents

Submitted October 27, Task Advancement Memory (TAM) uses what has been reliably accomplished at two timescales: it maintains verified progress, remaining goals and visual evidence during a task, then extracts reusable operations from locally successful segments after the task, including segments inside an overall failed workflow.

Why it matters

Long GUI tasks require more than retaining an action transcript. An agent must distinguish established outcomes from missing inputs and preserve the productive parts of failed trajectories. TAM organizes memory around task results and operations with explicit verification conditions, giving cross-application continuity and failure-derived learning a clearer engineering boundary.

A closer look

During execution, the user goal is compiled into requirements and Advancement State updates completed requirements, object bindings and pending work from observed results; an Evidence Cache retains source-linked screenshots or crops when text is insufficient. At task end, a model-based reviewer considers local results plus later confirmation or contradiction, retaining supported operations with entry inputs, expected changes, verification conditions, object roles and GUI realizations. Under a shared Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct backbone and 50-round budget on MobileWorld GUI-only, the base agent reaches 12.0% success, Advancement State alone 28.2%, and full TAM 34.2%; the strongest listed baseline, MemGUI-Agent, reaches 29.1%. TAM averages 20.6 steps and 29.2 EQA@50, and the authors report 38.7% fewer lifecycle tokens per solved task than the strongest baseline. On SPA-Bench English Level 3 with GPT-4o and Set-of-Mark, TAM reports 57.0% versus GUI-explorer's previously reported 53.7%.

Who this is for

Research and engineering teams building long-horizon GUI agents, cross-app workflows, task-state compression, visual evidence caches, experience memory and terminal verification

Original sources

Revisions & corrections (1)

— 新论文直接研究 GUI 代理如何把已核验进展用于在线执行与跨任务操作学习;日期、方法、比较条件、结果和限制均由 arXiv 记录与全文核验,适合原创双语研究摘要并并入任务终态/主动核验趋势。

Related events

Research

A second, independent VeriCUA turns GUI-task acceptance into active evidence gathering with abstention

A Google and University of Hong Kong team submitted a separate project also named VeriCUA on October 29. It inspects an environment or recording before constructing a task rubric, then gathers missing evidence through GUI, accessibility-tree, file and database reads, marking requirements met, unmet or unknown. In online experiments it reduces false positives against baselines on AndroidWorld, OSWorld and ScienceBoard.

Research

GUI‑JEPA replaces token-by-token action decoding with candidate-conditioned latent scoring

Submitted October 27, GUI‑JEPA targets single-step mobile GUI action selection. It transforms JEPA representations pretrained on unlabeled interface screenshots for each action and region candidate, then scores accessibility-tree candidates in one batch instead of asking a 7B vision-language model to decode an action token by token.

Research

IGG moves GUI grounding from clicking what is visible to recovering visibility first

Submitted October 23 and accepted to the EMNLP 2026 main conference, IGG requires an agent to reveal a target through scrolling, hovering, dragging, waiting or a state transition and then click it within eight actions. Its 601 tasks across 16 controllable mock interfaces measure visibility recovery that static-screenshot grounding omits.